Watch this space for the latest news from the Gagnon Law Firm, updates and changes to Missouri law, or general musings on legal issues.
|
posted Mar 2, 2010 6:32 PM by Joseph Gagnon
... so sayeth the Missouri Supreme Court. Well, some red light camera tickets, anyway.
Today, the Court ruled that the City of Springfield's red light camera system is contrary to statutes governing cities like Springfield. The problem is that the City had classified the ticket contest as an "administrative" proceeding, rather than as a municipal court proceeding. The City did this, of course, to get around the burden of showing that the owner of the car that is being photographed (the one who gets the ticket by mail) is the same person driving the car (the one who actually committed the infraction).
The Court's ruling prevents cities from prosecuting red-light camera cases in an administrative forum, thereby seeming to require the usual burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt to support the ticket. This ruling does not apply to the cities of Kansas City and St. Louis, which have special statutory authority to run these kind of administrative ticket systems.
The full text of the ruling can be found here. Congratulations to Jason Umbarger, a solo attorney in Springfield, who briefed and argued the case for the car owner. |
posted Feb 17, 2010 7:16 PM by Joseph Gagnon
LegalZoom--which touts itself as a "legal document service"--has been sued in Missouri courts for the unauthorized practice of law. More details of the suit can be found here.
People patronize services like LegalZoom because they understandably want to save some money. In truth, there is more to preparing a will--or incorporating a business--than just filling in the blanks in a form. Document companies like LegalZoom are no substitute for the advice of a trained attorney because they cannot offer individualized advice, causing various problems documented across the web. So while it is possible to execute a valid will or organize an LLC with LegalZoom, the company cannot tell you what the best option is for your legal needs. Use LegalZoom if you must, but realize that they are not providing you any legal advice. |
posted Feb 16, 2010 6:19 AM by Joseph Gagnon
The Gagnon Law Firm, LLC announces the hiring of a new Legal Assistant, Ramona Greer. Ramona's previous position was as an assistant in the insurance industry. She will bring the same high standards of customer service with a focus on client needs to the Firm. If you're in the neighborhood, stop by and say "hi" to the newest addition to the team. |
posted Jan 13, 2010 9:34 AM by Joseph Gagnon
When Congress restructured the estate tax back in 2001, the law allowed for a steady increase in exemptions before phasing the tax out completely in 2010. Back then, Congress decided to sunset the tax law, and in 2011 the estate tax is set to spring back into effect at 2001 levels. So the law was set up to tax estates over $3.5 million at 45% in 2009, no estate tax at all in 2010, and tax estates over $1 million at 41-55% in 2011. This, of course, is an absurd result. For the past two years I have counseled clients about this oddity, suggesting that Congress was likely (although not guaranteed) to permanently set the estate tax rate before the end of 2009.
The end of 2009 came and went, and--perhaps not surprisingly--Congress did not change the estate tax provisions. Unless Congress takes further action, people dying in 2010 will not have to worry about the estate tax. The downside is that some of those estates will now have certain assets subject to capital gains tax, since the tax rules that fixed the value of a person's assets at their value at the time of his or her death, are also eliminated. For some, there will now be taxes due on estates that the decedent (i.e. the dead person) never thought would be taxed.
Other estates may be affected by having now-outdated provisions in their will or trust. If a trust was set up to distribute an amount of assets equal to the estate tax exemption to one's children, for example, with the balance of the estate going to the surviving spouse (since spousal transfers are exempt from estate taxes), the wording of the trust could now be read to transfer the entire estate to the children, since the entire estate is now exempt from taxation. While the surviving spouse would not be without options to address this, it would still be a divergence from the decedent's intent.
Here's the good news: Congress can try to address this issue. The House passed a bill that permanently set the tax rate at 2009 levels, but the Senate has not acted. I continue to expect Congressional action, but am no longer as certain as I once was. If you are unsure whether the estate tax affects you or your family, contact an attorney at once.
|
posted Jan 12, 2010 12:27 PM by Joseph Gagnon
On January 12, 2010, the Gagnon Law Firm, LLC relaunched its website. The new site features a sleeker design, more information, and a blogging feature to help keep the public informed about legal changes and firm news. Check out the new site; I'd love to hear your feedback.
|
|